Good to finally see this become reality. Will be good to have the option for the young players and to get everyone more consistent playing time. It is only a one-year deal, so it also leaves open the opportunity for changes in the future if better opportunities present themselves.
I have definitely come around to the idea that it is OK to talk through ideas more than originally thought. This is the kicker:
And with every iteration of talking about the idea you actually understand the idea better. A new idea is this delicate thing, a mere thought floating in a single person’s head unprotected from criticism.
Ideas need other people to be tested.
You don’t have to live in public by Austin Kleon
It seems ridiculous to say, but 2013, the year I wrote the book, was a simpler time. Social media seemed much more benign to me. Back then, the worst I felt social media did was waste your time. Now, the worst social media does is cripple democracy and ruin your soul.
A lot of think about and digest in this one, and maybe a little bit of hyperbole at points, but there is a lot to like as well.
teaching from the Kindle by Alan Jacobs
And let me tell you, friends, teaching a book from a Kindle stinks. Big time.
That is the money quote. Read the comments as well because they are quite good and extend on the article quite ably and usefully.
There is the need to adjust teaching methods to make the most of the tools available, where that is appropriate. However, this is an issue I ran into when working through grad school: so much of the technology and applications available today are really quite bad for educational purposes. It isn’t that the technology is bad itself, but that within the educational context, they are not as useful as they could be if time was spent working on what the needs are within education (and at this point, higher education).
Trying to work out a workflow for digital discovery and note-taking for my capstone was painful. I ended up having to switch between three or four different applications to make it all fit together, and even then it was less than ideal.
There is a lot of low-hanging fruit to make scholarship and writing better utilizing digital tools. Kindle is just an example.
yet another post about making distinctions by Alan Jacobs
I have to move slowly with some of these things, because by and large my students mistrust and are deeply uncomfortable with such technologies. But all of them are, at least in potentia, pedagogically fruitful.
I know there is always talk about the new digital natives within the realm of higher education, but I think this paragraph hits on a good point. There is also a tendency to view things as inauthentic if they are not done well or there is no understandable benefit. Mistrust is a good word.
Bringing technology into pedagogy for the sake of technology can have limited or negative benefit. Intentionality, mastery, sound technology is important.