Facebook is purchasing Instagram.
Terrible, terrible news. Just terrible. Very happy I haven’t spent any time putting my stuff on Instagram.
Terrible.
Facebook is purchasing Instagram.
Terrible, terrible news. Just terrible. Very happy I haven’t spent any time putting my stuff on Instagram.
Terrible.
Lots of ridiculous stuff over the weekend about Readability that I had already known about for quite some time. Go ahead and checkout Twitter and search for Readability if you really want to get down a rat hole.
Regardless, I think there are some major things that haven’t been brought up with the recent outrage over how links were handled within Readability.
Almost every single defense of Readability comes back to the fact that they are offering to pay publishers. However, they just removed any sort of restriction on their service that would have required people to pay to use their service. So … what about those people who are not paying a thing for Readability? Are they going to pay publishers for the people who are not paying anything to use their service?
Match that with the fact that it sounds like Readability will just keep any unclaimed money after a year and you DO have problems and no matter how “good” those guys are, there are issues here.
I think there would be fewer issues if these two things happened:
There is still the issue of collecting money on behalf of publishers who might not want to have a relationship with a third part like Readability, but who cares as long as you are making money … right?
Readability has obviously prostrated themselves to the almighty “get all of the eyeballs and make money later” business model by copying Instapaper after initially working with Marco in the past (but who really cares) and then dropping their entry price to “free” because they are flush with money, so let’s not pretend that they are some kind of white knight in armor for the publishers of the web.
They’re trying to do one thing: make money.
Furthermore, designing in-browser exposes mistaken assumptions at the earliest possible stage in a build. This means we fail quickly rather than expending effort on high fidelity mock-ups that were based on mistaken assumptions.
Who is James Weiner? Oh, he only works on the front end of GOV.UK, so he needs to worry about little things like accessibility and making the web work for everyone.
I’d say he is exactly right.
Brad Frost wrote Responsive Web Design: Missing the Point and I recommend that you go ahead and take it all in. Pure gold.
I love this highlighted part:
The point of creating adaptive sites is to create functional (and hopefully optimal) user experiences for a growing number of web-enabled devices and contexts.
Yes.
Barry Ritholtz wrote Why Apple Should Grab Twitter over at The Big Picture.
Needless to say, I think this is a terrible idea. The last thing that Twitter needs is to get swallowed up by a larger company and the last thing Apple needs is a large acquisition to possibly steal any focus away from what they do best.
Let Twitter be Twitter and Apple be Apple. The acquisitions need to stop.