<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bob Martens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobmartens.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobmartens.net</link>
	<description>Everything for no one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The poor Mac Pro by Bob Martens</title>
		<link>http://bobmartens.net/2012/02/the-poor-mac-pro/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Martens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmartens.net/?p=884#comment-685</guid>
		<description>While true, it isn&#039;t a comparable system.

The Mac Pro is a professional workstation ... and sadly, you pay a TON more for that designation. Dual-socket motherboard, ECC RAM, the option to bump the RAM up to (possibly) 64 GB, four open removable drive bays ... those are things that cost a lot of extra money. Sadly, Intel has dropped the ball here by not supplying that first part ... a new dual-socket motherboard with accompanying CPU.

You are right that right now the Core i7 meets and exceeds what most people need in a workstation, but that&#039;s not why the Mac Pro has stagnated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While true, it isn&#8217;t a comparable system.</p>
<p>The Mac Pro is a professional workstation &#8230; and sadly, you pay a TON more for that designation. Dual-socket motherboard, ECC RAM, the option to bump the RAM up to (possibly) 64 GB, four open removable drive bays &#8230; those are things that cost a lot of extra money. Sadly, Intel has dropped the ball here by not supplying that first part &#8230; a new dual-socket motherboard with accompanying CPU.</p>
<p>You are right that right now the Core i7 meets and exceeds what most people need in a workstation, but that&#8217;s not why the Mac Pro has stagnated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The poor Mac Pro by Josh Siok</title>
		<link>http://bobmartens.net/2012/02/the-poor-mac-pro/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Siok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmartens.net/?p=884#comment-684</guid>
		<description>It could be that the iMac/Core i7 combination is more that adequate (performance wise) for most of the target market of Mac Pros. Most people cant justify or afford spending the top dollar on a Mac Pro.  Apple.com: The bottom of the line Mac Pro Quad-core Xeon, 3GB RAM, 1TB hard drive for $2499 does not sound compelling to me. Last i checked you can get a quad-code i7, 8GB RAM, 2 TB, w/ decent graphics card system running windows 7 for ~$700.  Considering the costs, it not very compelling to most.  I really don&#039;t think the CPU performance is the problem here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be that the iMac/Core i7 combination is more that adequate (performance wise) for most of the target market of Mac Pros. Most people cant justify or afford spending the top dollar on a Mac Pro.  Apple.com: The bottom of the line Mac Pro Quad-core Xeon, 3GB RAM, 1TB hard drive for $2499 does not sound compelling to me. Last i checked you can get a quad-code i7, 8GB RAM, 2 TB, w/ decent graphics card system running windows 7 for ~$700.  Considering the costs, it not very compelling to most.  I really don&#8217;t think the CPU performance is the problem here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mountain Lion: Decoupling Software by Mountain Lion: What I Know So Far &#124; Bob Martens</title>
		<link>http://bobmartens.net/2012/02/mountain-lion-decoupling-software/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Lion: What I Know So Far &#124; Bob Martens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmartens.net/?p=865#comment-683</guid>
		<description>[...] Decoupling Software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Decoupling Software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The World is Not What it Was by Bob Martens</title>
		<link>http://bobmartens.net/2012/02/the-world-is-not-what-it-was/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Martens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmartens.net/?p=892#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Agreed. The lack of long-term thinking is appalling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. The lack of long-term thinking is appalling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The World is Not What it Was by NateBeran</title>
		<link>http://bobmartens.net/2012/02/the-world-is-not-what-it-was/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>NateBeran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmartens.net/?p=892#comment-681</guid>
		<description>All true. Also hurts future content creators. We&#039;ll have the exact same situation that software creators have with software patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All true. Also hurts future content creators. We&#8217;ll have the exact same situation that software creators have with software patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  bobmartens.net/comments/feed/ ) in 0.16097 seconds, on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 1:31 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 2:31 am UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  bobmartens.net/comments/feed/ ) in 0.00029 seconds, on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 2:10 am UTC. -->
